Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Peace_Rules
In one form or another, skywatcher has certainly generated a ton of posts on this BB. It amazes me how people here continue to be sucked into his BS, even to the point of debating his motives. Isn't it obvious, we should ignore him.
|
It's a bit like pondering if Nancy is insane or just evil. It doesn't really matter. I'll probably keep looking at any SW post and if there's something interesting to say, I will. But at this point my response probably wont be to explain why some fuzzy blob isn't px since that's been explained a dozen times. I think most of us have to admit, even BA, that post of the UCLA crescent moon flare took a few seconds to understand. It doesn't really matter if he was trolling. And that question about the sun shrinking. It doesn't matter how silly the concept of shrinking is, the NASA pictures referenced were of slightly different size and I learned some things about the camera's orbit that I wouldn't have learned otherwise.
So if he is a troll, he's a pretty harmless one. And I believe the rate of annoying 'what's that fuzzy blob someone posted on GL?' questions has dropped off.