This is the thing, though. Take a motion picture, for example. We see motion. But there really isn't motion (meaning motion in the movie itself). It's just a series of photographs, and we see it as motion due to our own perception. So I sort of wonder if Zeno's paradox could point to the possibility of a similar phenomenon taking place with our reality. I'm not sure how that impact on Ken's last statement. But we certainly should not start out with our perception of a moving picture, and assume from the reality that is presented, without looking at the process behind it.

__________________
As above, so below