To be honest - the LR experiemnt has nothing to do with this recent issue. You've not actually made yourself particularly clear because you've said things that are not true. (i.e. that the results of the LR have not been replicated by chemistry when they have)

Going back on topic - how can anyone take this paper seriously when it gets the absolute fundamentals of the location, orientation, topography, detail and colour of the image in question wrong.

Doug