Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F.
I carefully read the post that contained the first quote I have posted. I am asking you directly to explain what you mean by "science corruption" and to give specific examples to back up that claim.
|
By "science corruption" I mean interpreting a
Positive test result (note: being true or false is irrelevant) as a
Negative test result. If you indeed had read the 2nd article referenced, this clarification would have been unnecessary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F.
Unless someone asks you to clarify...
|
Not really, not when something is as clear as I can possibly explain it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F.
..and Djellison is correct. You've gone off on a tangent that has NOTHING to do with the topic of this thread.
Please don't do that...
|
No he is not and neither are you. This is all in reply to post #7 which is not mine. Now please if we could act like grown ups here that would be good.