Am I the only person who really hated that show?
The speaker harped on about bad science and pseudo science and then continued to state almost categorically that absence of evidence was evidence of absence.
Allow me to state, categorically, I believe in astrology slightly less than I believe electricity is caused by enormous intangible invisible pink elephants. However, he relied almost exclusively on appeal to ignorance (you know the logical fallacy that says, well I can't see how it works so it doesn't).