View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2007, 05:58 PM
jamini's Avatar
jamini jamini is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 581
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by astrocat View Post
Parts of what is written here is correct.
What part(s)? Please be specific and quantify your answer with corresponding math, physics, reference papers and experimental data.


Quote:
Originally Posted by astrocat View Post
There was no big-bang - it was invented to account for the observed 'expansion' of the Observable Universe.
This statement is patently false. The Big Bang was postulated decades prior to the observed Hubble expansion.*

Quote:
Originally Posted by astrocat View Post
Other parts are not likely at all. That's how I see it..
Can you cite specifics and support your claims with quantitative material?

It is clear that you do not “see” things in much the same way as the majority of the astrophysics community.

*If I am not mistaken, it was first suggested in 1927 by Georges Lemaître
__________________
"I just have not come across anything that explains what I am trying to suggest."
- EU proponent not wanting credit for statement