I agree with all five of those points, Stu. It's just sad that so many people think some impossible conspiracy that is so plainly flawed is moreintersting than the actual science, engineering, and bravery, and sacrafice behind the real events. But that's the same sadness I feel when I see that more people find publications such as "the National Enquierer" and "Weekly World News" more interesting than...well, just about anything else.
__________________
I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
"A long time ago, yet somehow in the future"
|