View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2007, 09:08 AM
tusenfem's Avatar
tusenfem tusenfem is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Graz, Austria
Posts: 3,274
Send a message via Yahoo to tusenfem
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by upriver View Post
Hi, Eroica,

My name is upriver.

Yes, I introduced this idea from a different paper as part of my argument against the optical thickness explanation for the solar blackbody spectrum.

Here;
http://www.bautforum.com/questions-a...in-plasma.html

Notice how quickly H- was seized as the official explanation. There is no word of optical depth or 1/tau or 2/3 extinction depth in the explanation to Eroica.

Which would have been the official explanation(optical thickness) before I introduced the H- explanation for the solar blackbody spectrum to BAUT forum on 10-June-2007, 11:38 PM.

I think I proved my point. Say thank you to the ATMer.

Upriver
Well, that's taking liberty with reality, or at least context. That whole discussion was started up because you don't believe that a plasma can create a BB spectrum and try to do anything to prove you are right, including misinterpreting papers.
__________________

Any comments in glorious red are to be considered in ModeratorMode.


善數, 不用籌策 (shàn shù, bù yòng chóu cè)
He who is good at counting, uses no counting tools
“A good scientist has freed himself of concepts and keeps his mind open to what is”
道德經, 二十七 (dào dé jīng, 27)
Reply With Quote