View Single Post
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2007, 01:12 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 10,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nauthiz View Post
So here's a kiddie pool analogy that I think might be a little more closely related to reality: Fill a kiddie pool with water. Simulate the rebound by pushing the underside of the pool so that it sticks up out of the water. Now, I predict that the water level in the pool will be quite a bit higher because that "island" we've created will displace so much water. I also predict that higher we push this "island" up out of the water, the more it will displace.
Part of the problem with the kiddie pool analogy like that is that a displacement of the bottom in one area will be compensated in another. Like what you mention about the Netherlands in the last part of your post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grand_Lunar View Post
About rebounds, I suppose the nature of the magma underneath an area effects wether or not an area does rise after ice melts from it, yes?
Just whether or not?

Not on Earth, I don't think. It could be possible that an accumulation of ice on a particular part could result in a rise of that part, because of the interaction of water weight on the rest of the surface, but I don't think the conditions obtain on the Earth if they can at all.
Reply With Quote