Not very convincing, Ray. It sounds like you "make a universe" by starting with a "blob" of universe with particular qualities. Well, that's the problem, isn't it?

I think your time would be much better spent in reading up about actual current cosmology and astrophysics rather than making up such naive flights of fancy that are apparently very poorly founded in known physics - indeed, you rather smear all known physics. Such a tactic is not likely to find many supporters. You might attend the words of

Richard Morris.... "If a theory is crazy, or unorthodox, or seemingly bizarre, that does not make it pseudoscientific. Crackpot and pseudoscientific theories are bizarre in a particular way. They tend to ignore long-established scientific ideas. They operate in a world of their own, not in the world of scientific discourse."

or Gerard 't Hooft... "If history has taught us one thing it is that, with hindsight, newly discovered laws always turn out to be quite logical extensions of what we have already known for a long time."

__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.