09-August-2007, 09:37 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 737
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nereid
[Mod Note]
Two ATM threads started by rtomes merged; the second one was titled "Need advice on research related to quasars".
A belated welcome (back), rtomes!
Things have changed quite a bit, here in the ATM section, since you were last here. It might be a good idea to read the current Rules For Posting To This Board (esp #13), and, if you are interested, the various thread in the About BAUT section on the ATM section, here, here, here, and here (samples only).
[/Mod Note]
|
Hi Nereid
Thanks for the welcome, and your assistance here and also the various material around the forum. I have been reading the various threads on ATM, writing papers, rules for posting etc. and have found it very useful. At some future point after the Harmonics Theory thread has run its course, I might seek advice on writing and trying to publish a paper or two. The big problem is that I have done too much research that is interlocking and so it is not clear to me which parts would be most sensible to try and publish first (without getting rejected for being too far out of the mainstream). Probably I should raise these issues in that thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nereid
First, which methods do you think are insensitive (per my bold, in your post)? Specifically, which of the papers reporting quasar redshift analyses have you based your suspicions on?
Second, if you want to understand the methods used in a particular, published quasar redshift paper, I think BAUT's Q&A section would be a more appropriate place to start ... just as long as you don't phrase questions aimed at better understanding in a way that leaves readers with the strong impression that you're merely promoting an ATM idea.
Third, if you don't have access to, or don't even know of, the relevant published papers, then again the Q&A section is a much better place than this ATM section.
|
Thanks again, I can see that is so. I missed seeing the Q&A section initially.
Regards
Ray
|