View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 12-August-2007, 01:38 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,081
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by d3bunker View Post
I know that most people here are prejudiced against Richard Hoagland.
Hoagland simply cannot provide credible evidence for almost everything he says. This is a science board.

Nuff said...

Quote:
So, RAF you disagree with NASA specialists Brooking's report.
The Brookings report does not say that we have found any evidence of artifacts on the Moon or elsewhere.

Quote:
You completely exclude the possibility of finding artifacts on the moon,or venus, or mars.
Show me the evidence for artificiality...what you have linked to does not.

Quote:
You think that we are alone in the universe!
I think you like to "put words" into other people's mouths...not a good idea on this board.

Quote:
Originally Posted by d3bunker View Post
It's rare...snip...If it's a geology feature that is something that will create interest for the geologist.
Are you a geologist? If not, then why would you think that this natural formation is "rare" or "interesting"??

Quote:
Originally Posted by d3bunker View Post
I wonder Is it possible to talk about these matters without refering to Richard Hoagland?
Hoaglands ideas are so similiar to yours, I don't see how we can just ignore them particularly since You are the one who "referred" to the Enterprise Mission.
Reply With Quote