Quote:
|
In my idea energy is not a potential too.
|
Either ….
Quote:
|
I can't find what is "emr" in your idea.
|
You are not reading.
What is emr? What affect does it impose upon matter? What is the single individual source of all momentum? Energy, and that energy when returned to a base unit is simple a wavelength upon mass or emr upon mass. It does not ‘go through’ space, no medium/aether unless that aether is considered time, then you will see entanglement and what it is.
Quote:
|
It is an inwards oscillation of the spacetime. A sum of the oscillation results in spacetime curvature and gradient of the oscillations density results in gravity.
|
I disagree …..
Are you still using planck? Or ‘h’ to be clearer….? Angular momentum at the subatomic level does not exist. No particle, no spin …. Common sense!
Now in your math create a system, copy them and use the 2 identical systems and associate the resonances, tell me what happens …… hint … see entropy reverse! And if angular momentum is fixed, the results do not equate …… it’s stupid easy!
Quote:
|
A particle is in a balance if it aborbs from space the same amount of the oscillations than emits.
|
Emits what? Are you maybe pointing at emr ……. Or are you sharing the imposition to time and space based on these oscillations, is mass?
Quote:
|
The question is what is a structure of the spacetime ?
|
Simple…. Can you measure from point a to b without time?
No space exists without time and I know the concept is ‘stupid easy’ but not shared in relativity or planck. A fixation to the constant has showed results but not when systems associate and why that model is physically incorrect.
Proof …. Take a single cell of any living entity, now describe how it abuses entropy.
Can’t be done with planck, period!
We all know, if we are cold we put on a jacket physically obvious we reversed entropy but in the physics of a system, it is impossible to describe.
Space time is not anything curving……. This is a patch to ‘how it works’ in a round about way all based on the fact that the energy between the structures is not taken into account as the cause of the momentum.
Google up Cooke and space time and see a few more ideas about space time.
Space does not curve ….. gravity is entangled energy and can be described and scaled in van der waals/casimir; fact!
Follow each and then ask but I am not interested in someone else’s theories to impose on what this thread is suggesting. Open your own thread but please I do not play in any arena I can prove incorrect, every time.
No use in walking the planck, at the end it drops off but if you want to play tic tac toe and want me to prove this game, I’m your huckleberry!
And then when you see, I own you! Do the homework first and then let’s dance, otherwise …. I have much to do and the clock is ticking ……..
This is for food for thought so people can see ‘how it works.’ I do not need any lessons of old school and when I see a radius applied to time where entangled energy affects the amplitude of associating systems, then I will know you are reading.
Otherwise ….. next!