I missed this one before. This background I am about to give is necessary to answer your question. It is also of interest in seeing how I got to the redshift periodicities.

Originally I had no such concept in the harmonics theory and so had a problem of how to deal with the redshift. I first tried to address this by assuming that as the redshift velocity gos from 0 to c there will be the occurence of all the harmonics, so that e.g. the h=2880 one which is very strong will give c/2880 = 104.095 km/s. This didn't fit anything and stumped me for a while. Then I realized that Einstein's velocity addition formula for 104 km/s repeated 2880 times would not give c, indeed even repeated 1000000 times it would not. So I understood that you cannot get redshift periodicities by dividing by c. Because c really represents the result of adding an infinite number of any finite sized step together.

So I looked at how can you get a standing wave that is finite. It occurred to me that a wave which had extent over a distance to which z=1 would have an exact ratio of 2 in the wavelengths at the two places. Because harmonics theory says that standing waves produce 2x frequency, and this distance gives 1/2 frequency (i.e. 2 x wavelength) there is a feedback cycle. So I took the z=1 distance as the fundamental wave. From the Einstein velocity addition formula you can deduce that over that distance if the wave is divided in to h parts by the h harmonic then the relationship is (1+z)^h=2. When I understood that, and put in h=2880 I then got 72.15 km/s and I knew that I had a sensible solution. Then I calculated all the other strong harmonics giving the table that I just posted. I already found lists of redshifts that seemed to show several of the longer periodicities like the ~8600 km/s one.


It was a bit later that I realized that because at the nuclear scale energy is always moving to smaller waves (harmonic frequencies) then the mass of particles must grow over time. However if all particles have the same wavelength then they cannot easily do that because the waves going into one particle are the same ones coming out of others that are far away. This is not an easy problem to solve. In the end I understood that multiple frequencies are there at the same time and that one gets stronger and another gets weaker. At some point there will be sufficient stress on the wave structure to flip to a new state. When this happens to just a single atom, we see it as a photon being emitted or absorbed. When it happens to the whole solar system in a short time we see it as a mass extinction event because most of the life probably gets internally microwaved in a short period of time.

The funny thing with the harmonics theory is that you get a whole set of sine waves and add them up, but the answer is not what you expect. It is not a wavy line. It is near enough a horizontal line with vertical lines sticking up from it. It is rhythm. The bist that stick up are like a ruler in inches, where the 1/2" and 1/4" and 1/8" each stick up a bit less. But a bit more complicated than that. Here is an example graph. It has the time axis horizontally and the amplitude vertically and I split it into 12 equal sections to show how self similar it is in 1/12s.


This gives the best idea that I can give of answering your question. It is only one dimensional but we have to imagine space and time filled in this way. It shows multiple levels of periodicities. You can see some big steps that repeat and some medium ones and some small ones. The periodicities are like that and the jumps in mas will show a similar pattern. Many small jumps and some medium and few large ones. But always in steps from the periodicities listed.

You might like to calculate the mass difference between a proton and a neutron for fun and divide that difference into the proton mass. See if it comes out near to a strong harmonic.