View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 30-August-2007, 03:57 PM
korjik korjik is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paracelsus View Post
I'm going on the assumption that you meant the above quote to be taken literally and seriously, tofu. My response below is tailored to that assumption. If you meant it to be taken as humorous, then I beg your pardon in advance. So, here we go:

First off tofu, I'm a 'she' not a 'he, as you might have gathered had you bothered to read my profile.

Two: You are reading so much into one little word. My point with 'Yawn' is that the 'it's not CO2 it's the sun that is causing the observed warming' has been hashed and re-hashed several times on this forum. 'Yawn' was my expression of boredom that this point was coming up yet again. I'm not saying that the sun has no role in the climate or that cycles in radiative intensity have no effect on the climate. They have and DO--and I've started threads to that effect. However, there is plenty of evidence available in the literature that shows that the observed GW is not due to increased solar radiative forcing.

Three: I don't label people with anything--at least not publicly. You are the one labeling me.
I misunderstood your point also. Sorry 'bout that

I did know you are a she tho
Reply With Quote