View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-September-2007, 06:27 AM
Serenitude's Avatar
Serenitude Serenitude is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southeast Ohio
Posts: 2,422
Send a message via MSN to Serenitude
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyGene
Actually, I was trying to use Preferred Frames of Reference as a lead in to the idea that gravitational fields can be viewed as Preferred Frames of Reference. I also relied on my opening statement about "IT CAN BE EXPLAINED AS ....." as a way of pointing out that there are many ways of explainig many things. It seems to me that viewing gravitational fields as preferred frames of reference CAN explain the Twin Paradox, I didn't say that it DID explain anything.

BobbyGene
- This is called "baiting" or "trojan-horsing". DO NOT do this again.

Lay out your intended argument concisely, undeceptively, and honestly. This is my second dealing with you in 24 hrs. concerning your behavior and ethics on this forum. You may consider this an Official Warning. A further infraction of forum rules will result in suspension of posting priviledges to be determined by the severity of the infraction.
__________________
"I have this theory that the Apollo missions were faked when NASA found out that general relativity was wrong because the Earth was expanding due to the Sun's iron core being influenced by magnetic waves from the electric universe after being perturbed by Planet X and thereby causing global warming. Where should I start a thread about this?" ~ ToSeek

"Those are the people that wonder how a thermos knows whether to keep something hot or keep something cold." ~ NeoWatcher