In relation to the 4330 km/s periodicity that I claimed is present in a
galaxy sample.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nereid
...
Please select any one of the early papers which report periodicity in quasar redshifts. Please design a statistically valid analysis of a much more complete selection of quasar redshifts, and present it here. Please state - in as unambiguous a way as you can - what redshift periodicity would be found if the analysis you presented were performed. Please be prepared to answer direct, pertinent questions about the analysis you present, especially concerning the extent to which it would be consistent with the one in the early paper you choose.
|
The issue is whether the data presented shows a periodicity in the vicinity of 4330 km/s. Why do you repeat all this drivel? Rather than me answer two totally irrelevant questions, why do you not answer one simple relevant question. It is a yes-no question.
Do you accept that the graph with the green peaks marked shows a significant periodicity?
If you make a clear statement on this it will end the matter. You will either admit that these questions are nothing but evasion of fact of periodicity, or you will show that your command of statistics is very weak. In that case I will spend the time and prove the significance including the allowance for lack of CMBR frame but I will expect an apology and withdrawal afterwards because I do object to wasting time on all these silly statements that you make and silly questions that have no connection to the topic at hand.