Quote:
Originally Posted by rtomes
In relation to the 4330 km/s periodicity that I claimed is present in a galaxy sample.
|
Thank you for the clarification.
Could I ask that you take more care, in future, to state what you actually mean?
Quote:
|
The issue is whether the data presented shows a periodicity in the vicinity of 4330 km/s. Why do you repeat all this drivel? Rather than me answer two totally irrelevant questions, why do you not answer one simple relevant question. It is a yes-no question. Do you accept that the graph with the green peaks marked shows a significant periodicity?
|
Please present an appropriate quantitative analysis of the data in "
the graph with the green peaks marked".
In the absence of any such analysis, please state how "
significant periodicity" can be determined?
FWIW, the only "
significant periodicity" that I think could be claimed, in the absence of a quantitative analysis, is 500 km/s.
Quote:
|
If you make a clear statement on this it will end the matter. You will either admit that these questions are nothing but evasion of fact of periodicity, or you will show that your command of statistics is very weak. In that case I will spend the time and prove the significance including the allowance for lack of CMBR frame but I will expect an apology and withdrawal afterwards because I do object to wasting time on all these silly statements that you make and silly questions that have no connection to the topic at hand.
|
rtomes, you chose to write a post which includes that chart.
You chose to make (ATM) claims about what it shows.
BAUT members are permitted, even encouraged, to attack the (ATM) arguments you make, "
with glee and fervour".
If you choose to clarify your claims, you are welcome to do so (as you did with your claim that "
[i]ncompleteness does not create periodicity").
However, you are not free to refuse to answer direct, pertinent questions about the ATM claims you present, as presented. Of course, you may ask for clarification of those questions; you may say "I don't know" (or similar); and so on.