10-September-2007, 01:00 AM
|
|
Order of Kilopi
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,943
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Thompson
This topic came up in the ATM forum as well: New Evidence for Tired Light. I review the paper in that thread ( post #5). I think that the New Scientist article, and the blog piece posted in ATM both seriously exaggerate the significance of the observations. |
For the record: a BAUT member posted an explicit reference to that ATM thread, along with an unambiguous ATM claim (which goes way beyond what's in the relevant preprint), here in this thread. That post has been removed, and the case is under review with regard to promotion of ATM claims outside the ATM section.
As this topic is already the subject of a Q&A thread (as publius mentions), this one is closed. Please continue discussion in Breakdown of relativity?
The two threads will be merged shortly.
[ETA: Threads now merged.]
Last edited by Nereid; 10-September-2007 at 05:23 PM..
Reason: Threads now merged
|