View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 14-September-2007, 07:44 AM
Ari Jokimaki Ari Jokimaki is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F. View Post
When the probe didn't crash, he "could" have simply admited that he was wrong, but no...he had to go on and on about how the descent was not "as it should be" in an effort to "save face" with his "variable gravity" idea.
Jerry has been admitting his mistakes many times. How do you know that this particular case was "in an effort to "save face"" rather than case of Jerry genuinely seeing possibility for his hypothesis to survive? Did Jerry tell you this, or are you a mindreader?

Theories don't usually get abandoned at the sight of first trouble without thinking of possible ways the theory could still work or ways to correct the theory in order to make it work. That has been done many times to mainstream theories such as Big Bang theory, but perhaps that has also been only in an effort to "save faces".
__________________
"Stupidity gets denser in a crowd" - Old Finnish saying. [My website and My BLOG] [Nimblebrain forums]