Are you having fun yet? I enjoy being against the mainstream. Maybe some will look items a little differently, maybe a little mind can learn something even if the parental instincts of some do not like the esoteric.



Nice quote! Must be one of mine, unlike someone else on this forum who posted a question, as if I had asked it.

In any event a ‘purposed’ cause has begun.

I made the ‘prediction’ which caused you to write the request. The thought is yours based on a context I had made ‘here’ this medium the internet but the event was between the 2 quite distant. Nothing moved between us except through a medium but the words are pre-existing entities of pattern each conveys to be able to recognize the exchange as legible. The action taken is between the 2 points only limited by the medium and words. If we go either forward or back in time from the event the occurrence is only subject to the history in time and our described observation afterwards but the exchange is simply felt between the mass with unobserved affects being captured by anyone else that could cause an increase or decrease of action based on entangled event neither of our positions are aware of.

So even if we have an exchange the main exchange or effect may not be what we see in the observation.

No perfect vacuum, ever! Closest would be diamagnetic in an observable scale.

Mass carries energy/momentum in time and the magnetic field of the sun entangles all mass within the system, nothing in the magnetosphere is isolated or without exchange. When a per se photon is released it has a destination before the exchange and that exchange is <0t depending on the entangled energy between the specimens.

That sun is not throwing photons at us. And plasma is simply ‘portion’ of a unit of mass isolated by energy. The exchanges are immediate/predetermined and mass show the observer the existence of the energy/light for us to measure/observe.

For example; when any sunlight heads towards the earth, in your model the point closest to the sun would have a concentration of density and the inverse square share a reduction as distance increases but the amount of juice that a wavelength conveys is not simply proportional to the exposure but the exchange between the capacities of the mass exchanging. This is what is not recognized and why some energy/wavelengths are thought to simply go straight through the earth and never hit a thing. Billion dollar ‘water tanks’ waiting to see some unit.

See a pitcher of a baseball…. Up close it would be hard to hit the ball but as the distance increases you have the ability to adjust the receipt based on the other exchanges before the ball gets there. So before either determination to throw and swing, that time is entangled over the distance to each set of entangled event all within the subject neighborhood. IN the moment the scope appears random but at the molecular scale it is predetermined. As the perspective of distance/time grows the determination capacity increases as that energy from the event is shared.

A mental twist but the example is to show that a photon is not moving through space without an exchange predetermined by existing causality.

This is where Schrödinger had his issue with the cat! That exchange is determined by the conception of the experiment. The uncertainty is when you look to find the either/or as then to observe predetermines the exchange to either/or which is actually determined by an entangled causality. The reduced parameters of the experiment are the cause of the uncertainty, not the per se photon making a choice.

In fact it is this entanglement between structures is what causes the wave patterns of energy in the double slit experiment. The energy is entangled at both ends (release to plate) and no matter if you send “one photon” at a time or a blasting the pattern comes out the same. If they were ‘things’ in open space, then tell me if you drop one drop of water on a plate will the pattern be the same if you dropped a bucket of water on that plate?

we set the capturing frequency, predetermined before the signal was ever transmitted
And to note that anywhere in an existing transmitting point there are masses that interact causing exchanges but to capture that signals ‘material information’ a predetermination must be made of the observer/receiver.

Look into how electricity works, without a resistance the energy never moves from point a to b…. A phenomenon I noted when I was a kid but did you know that?

I am learning with you. You share your questions and follow the path and I will learn how to share the material.

This material is tough for most and why the mind needs to have each case brought to description, next we need to share the experiments that correspond to this.

But the terms are not going to state, “light did this and light did that” that is what is being born.

Light is not ‘going through space’ it is upon mass in wavelengths and when exchanged, the whole neighborhood ‘experiences’ the period. Like a memory, everything is a snap shot of a period, which is an existence in itself therefore affecting the next exchange causal to that one that just happened. (think double slit experiment, no matter; one at a time or all, the pattern is predetermined and time shows this)

Now because we “conscious” create the cause of the question there is either a predetermination for the exchange or a humble intent to learn, this is that uncertainty ‘choice’ that even remains purely causal based on previous and existing events in time.

No matter how you slice it there is another half to be made. The conception in time caused it.

And the conception is ours. “We the people” It may be tough at first but to recognize just how important our species is to existence would just ruin most and probably why I have the job.

It’s all good and thanks but I am not sure the answer helped you as much as me in this case

So to be sure I have conveyed something quite specific here is another tangent, someone look up Felix Bloch and how a crystalline structure holds a wavelength/memory….. any brain guys here? Look up glial, the cells, then the structural composition and note the fixation or crystalline ‘affixing’ they complete structurally in the brain and axon/mylean sheath.

Glial is what hold memories to fixed events in the network/brain, we sleep to record these.