Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOWatcher
You mean there are non-hardcore ones that are questioning this?
My own personal feeling is that as soon as you start say that things are being covered up when it comes to 9/11, then you are starting to cross the line into hardcores.
There are lots of things that needed to come out in the reports. Mostly because there are things that didn't go as they planned, things that could have been done better, things that went horribly wrong, and things that can be improved on in the future.
If it doesn't relate to one of these categories, then any mention is only there to make somebody feel better. And; I don't want the government wasting time and effort for trivial PR when there are much bigger fish to fry.
|
Not sure what the argument here is... lots of things went wrong... lots of things odd on that day. The best way to move on would be to lay it all out. That was the stated responsibility of the 9/11 commission. They didn't do that so it looks bad. If the administration doesn't care about how bad it looks... <shrugs> but it seems silly for the administration to get upset when they don't answer simple questions by releasing documents...
Personally I don't think there is a conspiracy, I think there's a lot of arrogance and stupidity... releasing documents may not make things better, but I am hard pressed to see that the action would make things worse. We live in a free society... if there are security issues say so... if not release the stuff...