More generally, perhaps a request that more use be made of BAUT's Q&A section? Or one to start an ATM thread and stop "the spamming approach to scientific inference" (as one BAUT member recently put it, in question form)? from Nereid's post

Well, maybe if there were a dedicated BAUT "reference section" with Q&A threads for any major topic overviews. I'd imagine to keep the information coherent and civil you'd want these threads locked, and maintained by one (or a few) dedicated editors. That way, if some paper comes out and brings the resurgance of, say, the EU claims, someone like me that wasn't arround for round one can quickly(er) catch up.

Of course, this still has the major drawback of requiring a lot of time and energy from someone.

__________________

I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
"In order to increase awareness of the homeless, security have been given binoculars."