Thread: my theories
View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 17-September-2007, 11:57 PM
Samuel Samuel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Pensacola
Posts: 12
Send a message via Yahoo to Samuel
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by absael View Post
The fact that a particle hasn't yet been detected doesn't mean that we can ascribe any properties to it that we wish... theory dictates that the antiparticles of chargeless bosons such as the graviton, photon and Z boson are identical to the particles (you could also take this to mean that the antiparticle doesn't exist). If you believe that the theory is incorrect, you should provide some proof, or at least your reasoning for believing so, other than that the existence of particles with those properties would cause accelerating expansion. I saw nothing in any of your posts that explains why the physicists who postulated the existence of the graviton were mistaken in their description of its antiparticle.
Im not enforcing these properties. I simply intend to set forth an idea that, if my obervations are correct, could explain the proposed question. I do not have the math or a sufficient amount of evidence (this critical evidence doesn't yet exist) to call it a fact, or even a theory, but I do think it is a plausible explanation.