Personal attack noted.
Not a personal attack. You attempted the "looks like that to me" argument again. It is a matter of observation that no one in this thread accepts that argument. Kindly stop making it.
You arrogantly propose that you can ignore how things work, yet lay burdens of proof on those who do, requiring them to disprove your idle suppositions. Kindly accept the burden of proof for the claims you make.
You accuse me of arrogance for ordinary expertise learned in the practice of my profession, yet set yourself up as a meteorologist of such eminence that your professors stand in awe of you. Frankly I'm not impressed. The complex behavior of fluid flow to which I alluded is part of the same physical kernel in the computational weather forecast models that are the bread and butter of modern meteorology. If you want to be treated as an expert, then kindly display expertise; don't merely insist that you have it.
None of this is remotely a personal attack. It is simply the rules of engagement for this board, and largely also for real life.
Please don’t call me a layman because I don’t know everything about dust on another planet.
Please don't insinuate that you do. Give evidence or retract your claim. But either way, quit stalling.
|