I can't offer much on this from an academic standpoint, but I do think that there are definitely certain areas of society where capitalistic competition makes utterly no sense (and of course many areas where it does). My main example is electric utilities. Would it make sense if many different competing companies were stringing their own separate transmission lines all over our cities and towns? That would be utter insanity. It would be an unneeded duplication of effort and expense that all consumers would end up paying for. There are many other excellent examples where "socialism" makes perfect economic sense.

The problem is, the word "socialism" carries such a bad connotation in the U.S. It is inevitably associated with Marxian socialism and therefore a stepping stone to communism. In the current world, this is ridiculous, but the ignorance and biases of Americans are, unfortunately, well rooted.

It's a matter of framing. Whoever is allowed to frame an argument has an almost insurmountable advantage. Obviously health care in the U.S. is a major problem. We've got hundreds or thousands of insurance companies that all want to maximize their profits, but at whose expense? Well, it's the patients. I think a central system would be a workable solution, but of course this would mean millions of people would lose their insurance company jobs. And once the argument is framed as "socialized medicine," well, you can just forget that potential solution simply because of the stigma attached to the word.

__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.