Hello, MarsRevealer, and welcome to BAUT. Please take the time to visit the "AboutBAUT" section, and read the rules for posting here. We do have civility and decorum, not to mention ad-hom, which you are close to trampling in your OP. Please be more careful after reading these rules.
Now, to the OP. Where to even begin with this.
You do realize that, since the funny picture caught by Viking, and released by NASA (which sort of invalidates your "The powers that be don't want you to see this..." argument), further research has been done, and shown it to be a common mesa?
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast24may_1.htm
We require
evidence of a coverup. Not hysterical handwavings of a person shilling their show and website. Simply saying "It's a huge conspiracy" is not convincing. Showing evidence of a conspiracy is.
Considering almost the entire educated world accepts that the face on Mars is a classical case of pareidolia (ie; seeing the Virgin Mary on a taco, seeing the face of Lenin on your shower curtain....), you have yet to present any evidence that the original Cydonia mesa is an actual "Face", let alone convince anyone that there are "more". You may wish to look up pareidolia here, for starters:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paredolia
On to your "evidence" for more. Citing blurry montages from your own, biased, agenda-driven website is not evidence. Can you provide any credentialed, independant evidence? If not, this is a case of classical Circular Reasoning, which may catch some of the gullible, but won't fly here for 30 seconds. You can read up on
that here:
http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...-question.html
That should be enough to start with. I look forward to your response.