Quote:
Originally Posted by JayUtah
A true experiment tests the circumstances to see if the contemplated cause-and-effect emerges. A conspiracy theory adjusts the circumstances until the desired cause-and-effect emerges, regardless of whether those circumstances bear any resemblance to real life or what happened in some particular case.
|
I'm sorry, Mr. JayUtah, but isn't that the same thing that you are doing when you say:
Quote:
|
We discussed the moving flag footage a number of years ago, but I think it went away with one of the demises of Apollohoax. We drew the conclusion there that it was most likely electrostatic attraction for the same reasons as Svector has outlined.
|
So you are basically doing what the Apollo Hoaxers are doing. Trying to find
the circumstances until the desired cause-and-effect emerges, such as saying it is electrostatic or some other force. Have you done any experiment to prove an electrostatic force is a) feasible b) strong enough to cause any movement? Perhaps explain the physics?
Also, isn't electrostatic force (almost) instantaneous? Why then is there a short delay between when the astronaut leaves the frame and flag moving?
I'm (obviously) not saying Apollo missions were fake but that type of reasoning does not convince me as to how the flag moves.
I'm only looking for explanations. I'm not challenging anything.