View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 14-October-2007, 06:41 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 10,760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Brak View Post
The article says that if the earth were a little less massive it probably wouldn't be geologically active. That seems unlikely to me. Even without plate tentonics we would still have shield volcanoes forming over hotspots.
Not only is it unlikely, it is wrong. The article mis-states what is included in the original research article, which (top of p.7) points to Venus and says "This observation indicates that the ~1 earth-mass case falls within a zone of transition between ‘hard’ stagnant lid and mobile plate regimes." The original article was talking about the distinction between plate tectonics and non-plate tectonics, not that between geologically active and non-geologically active (which even Mars certainly was at one time).
Reply With Quote