Here is how the OP of the other ATM thread you started on this idea ended:
Quote:
|
The big bang and expanding universe should be replaced by a static, infinite universe whose structure is a consequence of the motion of its gravity particles - see part 2.
|
When will you be presenting details of how the observed structure of the universe is "
a consequence of the motion of its gravity particles"?
In that presentation, showing that it is "
a static, infinite universe", to what extent will you be addressing Olbers' paradox? the primordial abundance of the light nuclides (H, D,
3He,
4He,
6Li)? the blackbody SED (spectral energy distribution) of the CMB? the angular power spectrum of the CMB?