Quote:
Originally Posted by Nereid
...
Let's try an even simpler question, about the ATM assertion: in what ways does 'gravity', in the ISU, differ from 'curved spacetime'? IOW, please expand on the part between 'looks exactly like' and 'looks almost exactly like'.
|
Curved spacetime had a start point 13.7 billion years ago or so. In the ISU, there was no start point.
Curved spacetime uses warped space to influence bodies in four-dimensional space. The ISU uses an energy field that connects objects in three-dimensional space.
The energy field has energy density consisting of unifying particles. Matter forms from the energy field when the density permits, i.e. when the expansion has lowered the density sufficiently to allow the unifying particles to combine. Combined unifying particles form protons and electrons.
The resulting hydrogen atoms emit photons as a result of the continuing density of the energy field. Gravity results as the energy field replaces the energy that was sloughed by the emission of the photon because the emission of a photon collapses the electron creating a low energy density which is filled immediately as unifying particles from the field rush into the low energy density.
A new photon has thus been added to the arena from the energy field and the process is continual and repetitive. The resulting gravity is variable over time within an arena. An arena is the space occupied by an expanding universe like ours. The ISU predicts that space and energy are infinite, arenas are limited by "critical capacity" and so there are an infinite number of arenas at any given time.