View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 21-November-2007, 10:07 AM
Coldcreation Coldcreation is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Thompson View Post
I cannot find anything in your long list which is inconsistent with big bang cosmology. How do you know, or on the basis of what physics do you argue, that galaxies cannot form rapidly in big bang cosmology? How, exactly does the presence of a few evolved galaxies in the early universe actually contradict big bang cosmology?

The references you cite are incomplete, and none are linked back to papers or abstracts. I cannot easily find where you are getting your quotes. Can you be more complete in providing references?
I had those links in another computer.

Here you will find most, if not all, of the quotes from my previous post.



Distant Red Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (Toft et al) arXiv:astro-ph/0503454 v1 21 March 2005

Ellis, R.S., 2004 Seeing the Very First Galaxies

Gemini Observatory, Faintest Spectra Ever Raise Glaring Question: Why do Galaxies in the Young Universe Appear so Mature?

and/or http://www.gemini.edu/project/announ...ss/2004-1.html

and/or Why do Galaxies in the Young Universe Appear so Mature?


Massive Distant Galaxy Calls Theory into Question

The Metallicity of 0.5 < z < 1 Field Galaxies




PS. I'll be back to respond to the rest of your post later.


Coldcreation

Last edited by Coldcreation; 21-November-2007 at 02:23 PM. Reason: took out an extra "?"