View Single Post
  #157 (permalink)  
Old 26-November-2007, 09:43 PM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Durnavich View Post
Risk assessment must take account not only of the consequence, but also of the probability. If the current data suggests that the possibility of a sudden loosening of the western ice sheet is low, then preparing for it or trying to prevent it most likely wouldn't be the best use of our time and resources right now. (Consider the cost of planning for the worst-case scenario every time you crossed the street.)

Global warming presents potential problems on many fronts: sea level, temperature, drought, rain, disease, hunger, etc. There is no realistic way to plan for the worst-case scenario in each case. A more effective approach is to identify the most likely scenarios as best as we can and put ourselves into a position to manage those as cost effectively as possible. That is, find the most bang for the buck.
A detailed appraisal of the possibility hasn't been done yet. At present there's only a lot of conflicting speculation.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
"The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote