Originally Posted by JayUtah

Not natural doesn't rule out artificial. Most people have detritus in their bodies. I carried a splinter for nearly 10 years, and I still have rocks in my knee from a spill I took when I was eight.

Dr. Robert Leir who has perfomed multiple surgeries removing these foreign objects has said some of the implants were biological and actually responded by "moving" when the attempt was made to remove them. He went on further to state that most of the foreign peices of metal removed have created nerve endings which, as humans, we still do not have the technology to accomplish.

...just fell from the sky one night and has been verified again to not be a meteor, asteroid, or anything from this planet.

Buzz Aldrin's alleged UFO has been covered at length. It hasn't been secret at all. It was a piece of the Saturn V rocket.

I apologize in advance again for not reading the other thread that talks about this...yet. But Buzz said during the interview he asked Houston how far away the rockets were at that time and they responded 6,000 miles, he then further states he knew this object was not 6,000 miles away but much closer.

To me Buzz Aldrin's words last night were an admission that this phenomenon is at least partly attributed to an extraterrestrial presence.

It was later admitted that to this day NASA still has no idea or admission to what this craft was that followed Apollo 11 to the moon.

Completely, totally false. NASA conclusively identified it as the SLA panel based on its trajectory.

So you are now telling me that during this documentary, not only did they stretch the truth, but they flat out bold face lied to their viewers, we are not talking a little stretch here, we are talking a completely made up, fabricated, based on nothing at all, lie.


Again why all the government interest?

Because during the Cold War the U.S. was understandably paranoid. At first they thought these sightings might have been of Soviet craft of some kind, such as recon drones or combat aircraft. Then they feared Soviets might use some gimmick to create a bunch of sightings that would tie up U.S. air defense while they launched an attack.

The government interest decades ago was simply to see whether these sightings could be tied to any known national security threat. In some cases that could be ruled out affirmatively, because upon serious investigation the real cause was discovered (usually mistaken identification of common phenomena). But the affirmative method is not required. That is, an investigation doesn't necessarily have to determine the actual root cause in order to rule out some other root cause whose ruling-out was the primary activity.

Nowadays, ironically, the criticism is that government isn't interested enough. UFO enthusiasts chalk this up to the government supposedly already having first-hand knowledge of space aliens, therefore no further public research is needed. It's more parsimoniously attributed to the prior interest having been satisfied, and no change in the observations warrants revisiting the conclusion.