View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 10:22 PM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Jacks View Post
My thinking is that more genetic diversity tends to be better for a species. Incidents like the Irish potato famine show that monoculture is a Bad Thing. And greater genetic diversity means more evolutionary paths are pursued, possibly leading to more advantageous traits emerging in the population.

Genetic diversity can result in what is sometimes called "hybrid vigor." An example that is sometime cited is that mixed breed dogs (good old mutts) often have less genetic problems than pure breeds.
Neither potatoes nor dogs can really be used as accurate analogies, as human beings in practice never approach the degree of line-breeding purity of either. Even the most inbred human gene pools have had occasional freshening every so often. And human beings often mingle their genes in ways that, if not purely random, are certainly not according to any planned breeding program.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
"The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote