So a scientific hypothesis should predict an observation, and also be falsifiable.
Darwins theory of organic evolution predicts speciation = speciation observed = theory validated.
AGW hypothesis predicts increasing CO2 will increase temperatures = temperatures fail to increase = hypothesis fails.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/...NTARY/10575140
shouldn't the
increases in CO2 have done something
significant?
maybe I am too simple to understand, or is AGW more scripture than science?
can you tell me what tests would falsify AGW?
or maybe there aren't any?