It is easy to shoot at other people.
It is not "shooting down other people" to give reasons why testimony offered as trustworthy is shown by the facts not to be. That is, in fact, how such evidence is tested for strength. You seem to have accepted the testimony of the key Disclosure Project "witnesses" with no thought whatsoever to the possibility that they may be lying in order to get attention. Unfortunately not everyone is so careless.
But remember an old saying "Don’t point out the piece of straw in your brother’s eye, when you have a rafter in your own".
Dr. Steven Greer is a charlatan and a profiteer, as evidenced by his own advertised activities. His star witnesses have been exposed as liars. If that constitutes the "straw," then where is your evidence that I have a comparatively larger "rafter" in my own? You do realize, of course, that the sentiment behind your quotation is that the critic is far worse off than the subject of the criticism.
No, your approach here is entirely evasive and self-serving. Your "eyewitness" testimony has been undermined and its proponent discredited by actions to which he freely subscribes. This is not mud-slinging. You gave evidence and it has been parried. Now you're trying to insinuate that it is somehow wrong to test the validity of extraordinary claims and allegations. Why are you so afraid of having your evidence tested for strength?
|