Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre
Quote:
Originally Posted by HenrikOlsen
Andre, Swift and several others, could you please get back to the original discussion.
|
Sorry I did not see this post while working on the other. But I still don't understand why the message is dependent on the messenger. Perhaps it's possible to split up the thread or shall I start a new one on solar cycles. |
I moved the post to your existing
solar cycle thread, which is where it belongs.
If you can't trust the messenger you can't trust
his copy of the message.
The message may still be true, but he can't be counted in the "for" column.
Similarly, you can't prove the messenger trustworthy by showing his message to be true, if you only look at his message you can only prove him untrustworthy by showing his message to be false).
__________________
‘To those who regard “crime fiction” as some sacred icon which must follow a rigid formula, I will always be the man who writes 18-syllable haiku.’
Trying to make sense of computers,
The Error Log.