Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff Mitchell
As for the galaxies flying red shifted off to Neverland as the Big Bang tells you, it’s not happening.
The red shift is caused because our galaxy in its’ orbit travels faster than some, thus the red shift, and slower than others, again the red shift.
But there are also blue shift galaxies, ones that are coming toward us. With everything being blown apart by the Big Bang, how do they explain that? Well, they don’t. What is happening is we are gaining on some detected galaxies that are in an outer orbit, thus the blue shift, and some on an inside orbit are gaining on us, again the blue shift.
|
NoXion addressed this above but you haven't explained how your model deals with our observations yet. We only see a relatively small number of blueshifted galaxies and they are within our local group. Everything further away is redshifted, and the further you look, the larger the redshift.
We interpret this in the following way: Our galaxy is part of a cluster of galaxies that are gravitationally bound to each other. These galaxies can move towards or away from or around or through each other, depending on their gravitational relationships. Thus we see a range of different
but small red and blue shifts for the local galaxies.
But the distance to other galactic
clusters is increasing due to the expansion of the universe, an effect that only causes distances to increase
outside of gravitationally bound systems. We only see redshifts for these galaxies, and the further away a cluster is the larger its redshift will be.
How can your model deal with these observations of increasing redshift, and
only redshift, over increasing distance?
Also, how does your model deal with the relatively large apparent angular size of the dimmest and most redshifted galaxies, which we assume to be an indicator of how close they were when they emitted their light?