If you interpreted anyone on here as saying (1) Casey is a crook, or (2) Casey is wrong because he is a crook, then you are not reading the posts. Instead, you will find us saying that Casey is not a qualified source, therefore his opinion is irrelevant and worth no further thought as reference material for discussion. That is all that was said, and all that was meant-- the rest you made up yourself so you could object to it. There's a name for that: strawman.