View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 13-January-2008, 10:13 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
Thanks; I know I've heard the distinctions, but I can never remember because it sounds backwards to me.

Yes; I was using size in a more general sense than just dimensions...but, I can see how that can be misleading.
Population III stars were proposed when it was realized there is so much recycled material in the current population, and very early evolution of heavy metals is necessary to explain the high metal content in the most distant quasars.

As a science, astronomy has never proven adept at reasonable naming conventions, preferring to cling to historical development. Why make it easier when there is so much to learn?
__________________
jwj

It's ok not to know. We should try harder to find out.
Reply With Quote