View Single Post
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 15-February-2008, 06:01 PM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G View Post
I agree with that part, and the fact that experimental data has now taken a more important role in real science (though there remain some areas of mainstream science where data is lacking and authority continues to rule). But the ID community is still fully in the old model, as there is no experimental data, just argument by those who are considered the leaders. As such, it remains relevant, in that community, the conduct and mode of inquiry of the people-- as that is all that exists. Indeed, the only experimental data directly referred to from that meeting was data that supported evolution, and the conduct of the people was apparently to avoid discussion of that fact.
You're still discussing the (inferred) method, not the people. Any individuals who follow the same slipshod methodology would get misleading results.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
Illuminati's Razor-The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer. - Fazor
"Every book is a children's book if the kid can read." - Mitch Hedberg
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote