Quote:
Originally Posted by astromark
Time does not change. The clocks that are measuring it do.
Time can be perceived to have changed its rate if you are traveling very fast. It does not actually change its rate of progression. Only your perception of it does.
We measure the passing of time. Not always so well.
|
I am a little confused by the terminology here. Initially synchronised atomic clocks
do lose their synchronisation if one is put on a jet plane and flown around the world a few times and then brought back to the other clock. A twin travelling at relativistic speeds and returning home
would age less than the twin that stayed at home. The decay rate of particles travelling at relativistic speeds
is time-dilated, allowing us to detect muons here on Earth that should decay at the edge of the atmosphere.
If the rate at which particles decay is time-dilated by relativistic speed, surely we can say that time
does change. If the twin who travelled at relativistic speeds comes home again and has
indeed aged less than the twin who stayed at home, surely it is not just the
perception of time that changes - they actually experienced time passing at different rates, didn't they? Am I still missing something here?