Quote:
Originally Posted by rtomes
[snip]
The recognition that the fundamental laws of physics must be non-linear is the starting point.
|
Would it be correct to say that this ATM idea intends to be some kind of theory of everything? That it postulates that all physical phenomena are, in principle, within its domain of applicability? That other postulates include a small number of mutually consistent concepts, and such concepts are quantifiable, in terms of a mathematical framework in which 'non-linear' is rigorously defined (in principle)?
Quote:
[snip]
This must be so or we could never observe anything as observation results from interaction which only happens in a non-linear system.
From non-linearity it follows that all standing waves must evolve with time. Any repeating wave in the universe that evolves must do this by developing harmonics which are exact frequency multiples of itself. That means that they are smaller waves. That leads directly to the larger waves losing energy, at a very gradual rate (the Hubble rate). That is the VMH (Arp-Narlikar).
[snip]
|
From this it seems that the ATM idea already incorporates several concepts from classical physics - time and energy, for example.
Is that so?
Does the idea include postulates, or definitions, of what the waves are
of (or in)?