Quote:
Originally Posted by korjik
First:
Quote:
|
And after that ask where He studied and who are His supporting referees and then point out that as a newcomer to the field of professional science that He is wrong.
|
Does not equal this:
Quote:
|
I am saying that "every" conceivable option would be most thoroughly and exhaustively undertaken to be absolutely certain to ensure that His mathematics does prove to be correct. In fact it is my belief and just that my humble and unimportant belief that He would be made to wait to ensure that full and exhaustive testing of His hypothesis and predictions could be carried out before the Absolute Theory Of Everything could receive approval from the properly appointed discipline of scientific endeavour and then He could be properly in the running, as He might be for consideration in the nominations for a Nobel Prize.
|
The first is an ad-hom dismissal of the presenter. The second is what is supposed to happen.
Second:
The rest of your post is correct, I did not define the problem completely.
Using base 10 integers where is the mistake in 2+2=5
there is no time evolution or space evolution so = is the absolute definition.
Not really important now tho. |
Then as stated I offer a full and heart felt apology to you
korjik my intention was not to dismiss you or offend. I had wished to present a case fairly and with strength, the idea that I had made an ad-hom attack did not occur to me at the time of writing.
Michael.