View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 29-February-2008, 08:15 PM
ATKINS's Avatar
ATKINS ATKINS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by korjik View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATKINS View Post
Your reasoning is based on the long-held but mistaken belief that cometary comas and tails are necessarily composed of water produced by sublimating ice. The belief originated in the visual aspect of comets as seen from the Earth. It was a perfectly respectable belief half a century ago when Fred Whipple coined the term "dirty snowball" because observation possibilities were limited to ground-based telescopes. The most recent observations and findings, obtained thanks to infinitely more sophisticated means and methods, have now falsified the theory. The corresponding evidence can be found here, here, here, here, here and here.
ummm. No.

None of that even comes close to being scientific evidence. None of it is even close to proof.
Kindly explain why.
In a court of law, "proof" is much stronger than "evidence", by the way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by korjik View Post
Do you have the mathmatical background to actually defend electric comets, or am I just wasting my time here?
Do you have the mathematical background to actually defend "dirty snowballs"?

If you are one of those mathematicians who still actually believe that the universe out there is only there to try to do its utmost to fit in with their pet theories and equations, then you are indeed wasting your time.
__________________
Where is the truth? Who sees the old hag and who the young beauty?