Quote:
Originally Posted by ATKINS
Kindly explain why.
In a court of law, "proof" is much stronger than "evidence", by the way.
|
We arent in a court of law, we are in a court of physics. The two terms are much more interchangable here. By proof, I mean that there is no science content in any of the pages you linked to. All it is is word salad with no math to show any meaning. Electric comets are very much a plasma effect. No math, no proof. No proof no evidence.
Quote:
|
Do you have the mathematical background to actually defend "dirty snowballs"?
|
Yes, but this isnt my thread and this is ATM. You made the claim, you defend it.
Quote:
|
If you are one of those mathematicians who still actually believe that the universe out there is only there to try to do its utmost to fit in with their pet theories and equations, then you are indeed wasting your time.
|
I am one of these
space physicists who actually has the knowledge to separate the wheat from the chaff. I can actually figure the effect of the IMF on a comet and vice versa. From first principles. Can you?
If you can then I ask you to do so. Heck, I will even make it easy.
If comets are an electromagnetic effect, what is the charge density and/or charge distribution on your favorite comet, or any comet for that matter?