View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-March-2008, 07:37 PM
Tedward Tedward is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 279
Wink

For shame, the great 2001 slagged off....

Can I add a "I think you have to take it further"?

The whole fake business needs to be defined by anyone holding it up as "stands to reason". Flag, on a set. Men on the moon, on wires and on and on.

Problem as I see it is the world was watching and listening. To fake it and match any transmissions then it needs to be filmed in one go. No set pieces. So that is the landing, filming, shots taken on the moon. All the experiments and data from etc need to happen in time as it would have, either way you believe it. It could not be done in set pieces. To achieve that in my opinion is a step too far for the film industry. The "actors" live on the set in real time and carry out and shoot all the images as it happens. CGI, non existent. No photoshop and no way to hide wires. It needs to be seen to be transmitted back from the moon in real time.


Big problem me thinks. Then there are faked transmissions sent to the moon and back to support it all.

Just a few ramblings.
Reply With Quote