View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 02-March-2008, 11:59 AM
Extracelestial's Avatar
Extracelestial Extracelestial is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 40
Wink True, but...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tog_ View Post
But see, Kubrick would have been foolish to actually use the same methods to fake the moon footage that he did to film 2001. In fact, every director of every film that deals with space is under a secret governmental contract that forbids them from using the same technology that was used for the fake landing. That's why, even today, none of them look as real as the Apollo ones.

Anything can be rationalized if you're willing to take it to irrational lengths.
Hi Tog,
true but Kubrick even being on the governments payroll was more free to do what he wanted. He was, as far as I know, the only director which had a blanque cheque from MGM to film whatever he wanted.
However, I see the point your making. So how's this one: even if Kubrik didn't share his secret receipe how to perfectly fake Moon gravity how comes that nobody in the mean time found out? The moon landing is almost forty years old and there have been many gifted directors who could have reinvent Kubriks technique. Let's propose to Quentin Tarrantino to make a nice deep space zombie romance set on Arisia.
Extracelestial
__________________
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - Arthur C. Clarke

Last edited by Extracelestial : 02-March-2008 at 12:00 PM. Reason: Typo in signature
Reply With Quote