Quote:
Originally Posted by rebel
I don't know about you, but I'm not going to spend 8 to 12 months or longer studying an equation that hasn't been proven in the first place. Just because someone "important" writes an equation and says that's the way it is, and no one has found a flaw in it, doesn't mean it's not flawed. I'm going to spend my time with nature, nature doesn't lie. People just have different views of what they saw in nature. Michael Noonan is so right when he posted "When God Himself turns up to explain to mainstream science that He did it differently, you can be quite sure their mathematics will prove Him wrong too."
You can make the simplest things complicated so as to confuse anyone!!!!
|
How much physics do you know? Physics gets less precise as you get further along, not more. Most physicists study equations for decades trying to find another decimal of confirmation or to find a flaw.
Spend all the time with nature that you want, but while nature dosent lie, what you think you see and what is there can be two very different things.
the fact that you dont know enough to know how complicated things really are isnt my fault or my problem. Assuming that scientists are just trying to get you by making things harder than they need to be is wrong, and insultingly so. I would love it if all of physics could be simple one liners, but that is not the way it is, no matter how much you may dislike it.